Skip to main content

How Facebook has got us all at ransom.

After the privacy scandal of facebook. I admit that I am still an amid user. Not through any real choice of my own but by the simple fact that facebook has way too much inappropriate photos evidence against me.

Before my generation,  photographs were much less accessible. You needed an actual camera (not just one attached to your phone). You would then have to print them out at a one hour photo specialised store. When I hit my early 20s photos were easily accessible and quickly posted online. Often at a time when my judgment had left me. Thank you, alcohol. Thank you, youth.

Facebook has started to change it's public image from data stealing to privacy aware. It is also trying to play to our nostaglic side by enabling a section called 'memories'.

After clicking on this memories section, I am bombarded by photos of my university days. Pictures of my face looking supple and fuller. I don't mind that. I know I'm destined to get older. We all are.

I just don't recognise nor understand that girl that I see in the photographs.

I don't 'get' her.

I would never take that many photos now. Even if I did, they would not be posted on facebook. Or instagram. Or if they did, it would be over my dead body.

How many photos can you possibly take of the same pose?

How much fake tan can you put on for a night out?

Why was I wearing a mini dress in the middle of winter?

What was with those hair extensions?

The 'memories' section also likes to remind me of my insightful and informative 'status updates' from back then.

Such as:

'Jacinta went somewhere she hadn't been in 13 weeks..... the gym.'

'Jacinta hates studying'

'Jacinta hates assignments'

'Jacinta needs botox in her lips'

How about STFU?

I feel sorry for the people on my facebook during those years who had to endure those insightful status updates. I'm sorry guys.

I don't know who that girl is.

I really don't.

You see, I can't leave Facebook because Facebook has me at ransom. While you may say 'well you can delete/remove the tags' of the inappropriate photos. That's all well and good from my end. Unfortunately I wasn't always the uploader of those photos. I am also no longer friends with those people and there's too many for them to manually delete (and super awkward for me to ask).

If I can't control the amount of photos on there, I need to at least be able to have the 'illusion' of control by overseeing the damage that has been done to my brand/image. That's why I can't leave.

As for the old status updates? They are being manually deleted day by day.

In a way I wish I was from an older generation because my youth wouldn't have been so well documented and online.

As they say 'Youth is wasted on the young'.

If I had the wisdom now, I wouldn't have uploaded so much. It's amazing how much you change in 10 years.

So as you can see, I can't leave Facebook. Not yet anyway.

I'm at ransom.

They got me when I was young. I'm now forever trapped.











Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Malcolm in the Middle

Why it’s better to be feared than loved if you cannot be both After the recent resignation of Malcolm Turnbull there has been much commentary surrounding his contributions or, more accurately, lack of contributions during his stint as Prime Minister. Leading up to his original appointment as Prime Minister he came with much promise and ambition as a strong Coalition leader. He represented a palatable ‘centre-right’ leader with moderate political beliefs. On the one hand approved by conservatives for being pro business and those to the left found him to be their preferred coalition leader for his stance on the Republic.  His political persona was a smooth negotiator and a successful wealthy business man in his own right.  Finding the balance between being a leader with conviction and one who played it safe and survived was the question for Turnbull. He chose the latter. Self preservation. Unfortunately in politics, it is cut throat, even choosing the saf...

How safe is your baby really?

The strict requirements sound fit for hannibal lecter or a vampire. But no, it's actually for babies.  Safety requirements change over time but maternal instinct and proper supervision don't.  When I was expecting my first child I was super excited about the prospect of buying new stuff. In that 'decorate the nursery' kind of way. When I walked into the baby store that excitement quickly turned into dread. so many products were shouting at me. 'BUY ME.' 'You'll need me to make your child SMART. You'll need me to keep your child SAFE. There was so many products aimed at babies, newborns, 6 months, 12 months. I tried to rationalise it all. What did I really need? I then categorised them into 'nice to haves' and 'essentials'. 'I shouldn't buy this book (number 30)' I thought to myself.  How much can a 6 week old baby really read or understand? As the Mum guilt ensues.. the credit card comes out. Take my mone...

What if William Tyrrell was black?

WHAT IF WILLIAM TYRRELL WAS BLACK? While we are still on the lookout for William, perhaps we have forgotten that 20,000 children are reported missing in Australia every year.  You'd be living under a rock if you didn't know who William Tyrrell is.  The smiley (then) 3-year-old boy in his spiderman costume captured the attention of the masses when he suddenly disappeared o n 12 September 2014 from the front of his parent's house while playing hide and seek.  Anyone who is a parent (or not) most likely has sympathy for the Tyrrell family. It would be heart wrenching, gut wrenching, full of sleepless nights wondering what on earth has happened to your chid. The family still do not have closure as William is still missing without a trace.  Police have grave concerns surrounding the disappearance. It is common knowledge that after the first 72 hours of a person's disappearance, if they are still not found, it is unlikely they will survive.  ...