Skip to main content

The C Section Stigma is real.


'It's a shame you have to do it that way... Are you sure the baby won't move?'

Comments from strangers and relatives have left me convinced that the c section stigma is alive and kicking. 

Women are amazing. Our bodies can do amazing things. We can carry life that starts out the size of a poppy seed and then transforms into a full grown baby over 9 months. We put up with the nausea, the vomiting all because we choose to bring life into this world. We sacrifice our bodies. We sacrifice our vices all in favour of supporting human life.

Before I delve any further into this topic I want to make a quick disclaimer, women who cannot have kids are no less women than those who can. We are so much more than what our uterus can and cannot do.

Yet us women are always competing with each other aren't we? It's all in the subtle undertones, the hints that we give off.

Childbirth and pregnancy is a natural wonder of nature. That doesn't mean that nature was kind. Or that it's a perfect system.

If it were perfect, women would have mandatory orgasms to get pregnant. Men would carry the baby 50% of the time. Childbirth would be painless. Nature can be finicky and the slightest deviation can mean things can go wrong. Cervix not dilated enough? Baby's head caught on the pubic bone? Baby facing wrong way? Placenta in the way of a vaginal delivery? Labour not progressing? Incompetent cervix? Within the realm of natural birth things do not always go smoothly. Sometimes an emergency c section is the only viable option. 

A lot of the stigma that surrounds c sections is the belief that natural labour is best but just because something is 'natural' doesn't mean it is perfect. Ever experienced the pain of wisdom teeth coming through? well that is a  'natural' process but far from perfect. Nature is flawed. Childbirth may be natural but it can also be very flawed.

With medical advancement, a lot of us forget that in the victorian era, it was very common for women to die in childbirth. There were no c sections available, the doctors who delivered the baby did not sanitise their hands, infections spread and infant mortality was very high. In fact if it wasn't for the medical advancement today, I would refuse to have children. There is no way I would risk my life. Unfortunately few women had that choice back then.

Some women are lucky enough to have a straight forward labour, my mother was one of them. She had three kids all natural, no pain killers. She didn't even know she was in labour. Maybe she has a high pain threshold but for her having children was no big deal. Few women I know have also had varying degrees of what my mother experienced.

Other women are not so lucky, they can experience excruciating pain. Hours and hours of endless labour. Or severe vomiting from the beginning till the end of pregnancy (hyperemesis gravidarum) to the point of hospitalisation like Kate Middleton...who decided to have three. She must really like kids. If I were her I would have stopped at one and told my husband to rack off. Lucky for her she doesn't have a real job and lots of tax payer money for support.

For me a c section is mandatory. My child is very comfortable where she lays as I write this. She is in a transverse lie, has remained there and I am now well into the third trimester. For me to give birth naturally would be death sentence. If I was in the Victorian era... I'd be dead at 30. Possibly even younger.

The c section is the safest option for me. It's fine with me. I had been to antenatal classes and seen the stages of labour. It wasn't particularly appealing and neither was the c section mind you, but at least I could plan around it. There is definitely no 'easy way out' when it comes to delivering a baby.

Kate Winslet experienced 'c section shame' and later admitted that she was embarrassed that her first child had been born via c section. That her 'womanly hips' had not served their purpose. That she had somehow failed as a woman.

Is it any wonder that men run the world when we are insecure about the very way in which we deliver babies? Never mind that we have carried a baby for 9 months...if the delivery process wasn't perfect (through no fault of our own) shame on us!

Image result for kate winslet
C section mothers are vilified for this. They are told they 'wouldn't understand real labour' that they are not 'real women'. Is it just me or is the fact that we can have children at all amazing? That what we should be focussing on is a healthy mother and child. Who cares whether or not a woman pushed the baby out through natural labour or a c section. It doesn't impact whether or not you're going to be a good parent.

Comments I have received include:

'It's a shame you have to do it that way... Are you sure the baby won't move?'

The baby hasn't moved and the Doctor says its unlikely that she will. It's not a shame. It's actually convenient.

'But c sections are soooooo risky.'

You know what's more risky than a c section? Me attempting to give birth naturally.

'But your baby's immune system will be less healthy with a c section than natural labour.'

My baby will die if I don't get a c section, so I'm not concerned about immunity, also the baby has received some of my immunity already and will continue to receive it if I breast feed. No biggie. Thanks for your concern.

'You don't understand what it's like to go through labour so your birth doesn't count.'

Congratulations, you managed to push a baby out of your vagina. Do you want a medal? I'll give you the 'I'm the most obnoxious woman who ever gave birth' medal because you've definitely won that.

Truthfully, in spite of all of the above comments I am not bothered at all by my upcoming c section. All I want is a safe delivery for baby and I.

I am not ashamed of the fact that I'm getting a c section. I'm proud of the medical advancements that are available to women like myself. I like being in control of when I can give birth. I'm a planner so a c section is what's going to work for my husband and I.

Enough judgment please.

Let's get on with the wonderful, yet onerous job of being parents. My time is coming up so the nerves are kicking in.

Thanks for reading!

xx












Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We won't achieve Gender Equality until Ardern's situation is viewed as normal.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern discovered she was pregnant only six days away from being announced as Prime Minister on 19 October 2017. At first she and partner Clarke Gayford chose to keep it quiet but since announcing her pregnancy the 37 year old has received a mixed response with some feeling 'betrayed' by the announcement, accusing her of being 'selfish' for putting her needs before her country and that she chose to have her baby at the wrong time and should have 'waited' until she wasn't prime minister. Others have suggested that due to the pregnancy she will not be 'fit for purpose' and cannot possibly handle being prime minister as well as being pregnant. Mainly because you know....'baby brain?' There has also been concern around the amount of time she will take for maternity leave. Ardern has stated that she is going to take six weeks off and that her partner Gayford will look after the baby. Ardern's situat...

It's not accurate to say that someone 'lost' their battle with cancer

Whenever I see a well known person or celebrity who died of cancer the common text surrounding the death will usually include sentences such as ‘they lost their battle with cancer.’ I’ve had family members pass away from this disease but I know that I am not alone. Around 1 in 3 people will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lives. My issue with the phrase is that cancer is not a battle one can control. By categorising a cancer death with ‘losing the battle’ implies that there is an element of control by the person suffering from the disease. The success rate will depend on the stage of cancer, how far it has spread and how aggressive the cancer is. Even after a cancer battle is ‘won’ (meaning remission) it is still an on going burden. Cancer treatment today involves chemotherapy but the important thing to remember is that chemotherapy is not a cure. It is a treatment. That individual will still need to monitor their cancer for years to come. ...

Freedom of Speech is Un-Australian...literally

The NSW Government passed a bill which seeks to enable 'safe access zones' for women visiting abortion clinics. The bill will mean that pro life protesters cannot harass women entering these clinics (at least within a 150m radius). This is a small victory for women who choose to access these services. What is surprising about the bill being passed was the lack of support from the NSW Minister for Women - Tanya Davies. Davies cited her reason behind the her decision was to give  protesters the opportunity to 'give information' to these women. That reasoning is unsatisfactory, for instance, if Davies is concerned about the 'information' that women need to have regarding abortions then she is misinformed about the actual procedure of abortion in NSW. The current procedure for women who choose to abort consists of counselling prior to making that final decision. At that counselling session they would be adequately informed of all their options. Therefore the ...