Skip to main content

Gender neutral teacher causes controversy at high school

The teacher has used the title 'MX' (pronounced Mix) in lieu of Mr/Mrs and is causing outrage amongst parents. 

Has Gender Neutrality gone too far?

A teacher at a north western all boys Sydney high school has recently caused controversy with his notable gender neutrality stance.

The north western area where the school is located is generally known for it's conservative political views. No doubt this gender neutral teacher stands out... but for all the wrong reasons. 

Parents have complained that the teacher has used the title 'MX' in lieu of Mr/Mrs and is causing confusion amongst their boys. The teacher does not identify with being male or female and insists the students are to use 'gender neutral pro nouns'.

Gender neutral pronouns include 'they, their, them'. This approach has been tried in some schools in the US with the gender neutral teachers forced to move on to a different school. Not everyone is accepting of the gender neutrality movement. 

One father from the high school was quoted on the issue as saying:

'I don't believe my son has ever met a transgender person, these young boys are impressionable and I think someone should have consulted the parents.'

The NSW Department of Education has backed the gender neutral stance by suggesting that they support 'equal opportunity' in employment. 

The issue with the Gender Neutrality movement is that the human race is not genderless. If you are human you are either male or female. Its a factual question, not an identity question. 

Transgender people by contrast  are a completely different situation. Most people can understand a man who wants to be a woman and  a woman who wants to be a man. Gender Neutrality is to say that you don't identify with either gender and insist that gender neutral pronouns are used, where do we draw the line? 

Don't get me wrong there are some aspects of gender neutrality that can be beneficial to children. Such as avoiding gender labels when it comes to sports, this can help both genders recognise their full potential without being limited by their gender. However, the identity question of being gender neutral is still quite baffling. 

In surveys, they can now ask whether you are a) female b) male or c) don't identify with either. Again, maybe I'm alone here but it's not an identity question. Transgenders by contrast, at least pick a gender and work towards undergoing the transformation. Gender neutrality opts out of falling into any category at all. For me,  it's the same logic as saying 'I don't identify with being human'.  Maybe surveys can add a fourth option d) non human identity. Then we can start the Non Human Identity movement. 

There is scope for transgender individuals to be accepted by society, we still have a long way to go to over come the transgender phobia, but gender neutral? sorry, we aren't ready yet. 



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How safe is your baby really?

The strict requirements sound fit for hannibal lecter or a vampire. But no, it's actually for babies.  Safety requirements change over time but maternal instinct and proper supervision don't.  When I was expecting my first child I was super excited about the prospect of buying new stuff. In that 'decorate the nursery' kind of way. When I walked into the baby store that excitement quickly turned into dread. so many products were shouting at me. 'BUY ME.' 'You'll need me to make your child SMART. You'll need me to keep your child SAFE. There was so many products aimed at babies, newborns, 6 months, 12 months. I tried to rationalise it all. What did I really need? I then categorised them into 'nice to haves' and 'essentials'. 'I shouldn't buy this book (number 30)' I thought to myself.  How much can a 6 week old baby really read or understand? As the Mum guilt ensues.. the credit card comes out. Take my mone...
Post a Comment
Read more

Malcolm in the Middle

Why it’s better to be feared than loved if you cannot be both After the recent resignation of Malcolm Turnbull there has been much commentary surrounding his contributions or, more accurately, lack of contributions during his stint as Prime Minister. Leading up to his original appointment as Prime Minister he came with much promise and ambition as a strong Coalition leader. He represented a palatable ‘centre-right’ leader with moderate political beliefs. On the one hand approved by conservatives for being pro business and those to the left found him to be their preferred coalition leader for his stance on the Republic.  His political persona was a smooth negotiator and a successful wealthy business man in his own right.  Finding the balance between being a leader with conviction and one who played it safe and survived was the question for Turnbull. He chose the latter. Self preservation. Unfortunately in politics, it is cut throat, even choosing the saf...
Post a Comment
Read more

It's not accurate to say that someone 'lost' their battle with cancer

Whenever I see a well known person or celebrity who died of cancer the common text surrounding the death will usually include sentences such as ‘they lost their battle with cancer.’ I’ve had family members pass away from this disease but I know that I am not alone. Around 1 in 3 people will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lives. My issue with the phrase is that cancer is not a battle one can control. By categorising a cancer death with ‘losing the battle’ implies that there is an element of control by the person suffering from the disease. The success rate will depend on the stage of cancer, how far it has spread and how aggressive the cancer is. Even after a cancer battle is ‘won’ (meaning remission) it is still an on going burden. Cancer treatment today involves chemotherapy but the important thing to remember is that chemotherapy is not a cure. It is a treatment. That individual will still need to monitor their cancer for years to come. ...
Post a Comment
Read more