Skip to main content

Milo Yiannopoulos doesn't shock me and he shouldn't shock you either

Milo Yiannopoulos has caused quite a stir since arriving in Australia for his tour, to say the least, with the violent protests breaking out in Melbourne upon his arrival.

He is a lewd, walking contradiction, for example he is gay, yet doesn't really stick up for the LGBT community and appeals to many conservatives for his strong right winged views.

Yiannopoulos is against political correctness and has helped support white supremacist views when he worked as a journalist.  He has stirred the pot with feminists down under by plastering a picture of Clementine Ford and labelling her 'unfuckable'. He is against feminism and labels it cancer.

He has labelled muslims as 'rapists' and 'terrorists', has expressed a view that underage sex can be consensual and refers to victims of child sexual abuse as 'attention seekers'.

Milo Yiannopoulos is either genuinely confused about who he is or he knows exactly what he's doing, which is causing a stir to the general population and the more attention we pay to it, the more attention he gets.

Yiannopoulos started his life as an attention seeking stirrer. He has dropped out of university twice. He had a life of privilege but never managed to do anything meaningful. He may talk with a posh accent but all you have to do is scratch the surface and you will find that he's just full of thoughtless easy labels and ignorance. His audience finding him easy to understand and identify with.

He certainly has a lot to say, but a shallow brook will always babble the loudest.

'Shut him up!' is the common rhetoric from protesters, 'Don't let him speak in parliament'! There are petitions going around social media to prevent him from talking in Australia.

The truth is that we can try to prevent him from talking as much as we want but just like Pauline Hanson's views may not be popular with most, there is still an appetite for right winged views. We cannot be the thought police of other individuals. Yiannopoulos wouldn't have an audience if other people didn't agree with what he says.

He is not an influencer of the Australian people he is merely voicing the views of what was already there.

Milo Yiannopoulos is not a member of the australian parliament.

He is not a real game changer, he is a uneducated, attention seeking, sunglass-wearing fly, that will buzz away back to the UK once his tour has finished.

His words do not shock me and he shouldn't shock you either.

In the mean time, can we please keep Paul McCartney?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

We won't achieve Gender Equality until Ardern's situation is viewed as normal.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern discovered she was pregnant only six days away from being announced as Prime Minister on 19 October 2017. At first she and partner Clarke Gayford chose to keep it quiet but since announcing her pregnancy the 37 year old has received a mixed response with some feeling 'betrayed' by the announcement, accusing her of being 'selfish' for putting her needs before her country and that she chose to have her baby at the wrong time and should have 'waited' until she wasn't prime minister. Others have suggested that due to the pregnancy she will not be 'fit for purpose' and cannot possibly handle being prime minister as well as being pregnant. Mainly because you know....'baby brain?' There has also been concern around the amount of time she will take for maternity leave. Ardern has stated that she is going to take six weeks off and that her partner Gayford will look after the baby. Ardern's situat...

It's not accurate to say that someone 'lost' their battle with cancer

Whenever I see a well known person or celebrity who died of cancer the common text surrounding the death will usually include sentences such as ‘they lost their battle with cancer.’ I’ve had family members pass away from this disease but I know that I am not alone. Around 1 in 3 people will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lives. My issue with the phrase is that cancer is not a battle one can control. By categorising a cancer death with ‘losing the battle’ implies that there is an element of control by the person suffering from the disease. The success rate will depend on the stage of cancer, how far it has spread and how aggressive the cancer is. Even after a cancer battle is ‘won’ (meaning remission) it is still an on going burden. Cancer treatment today involves chemotherapy but the important thing to remember is that chemotherapy is not a cure. It is a treatment. That individual will still need to monitor their cancer for years to come. ...

Freedom of Speech is Un-Australian...literally

The NSW Government passed a bill which seeks to enable 'safe access zones' for women visiting abortion clinics. The bill will mean that pro life protesters cannot harass women entering these clinics (at least within a 150m radius). This is a small victory for women who choose to access these services. What is surprising about the bill being passed was the lack of support from the NSW Minister for Women - Tanya Davies. Davies cited her reason behind the her decision was to give  protesters the opportunity to 'give information' to these women. That reasoning is unsatisfactory, for instance, if Davies is concerned about the 'information' that women need to have regarding abortions then she is misinformed about the actual procedure of abortion in NSW. The current procedure for women who choose to abort consists of counselling prior to making that final decision. At that counselling session they would be adequately informed of all their options. Therefore the ...