Skip to main content

Milo Yiannopoulos doesn't shock me and he shouldn't shock you either

Milo Yiannopoulos has caused quite a stir since arriving in Australia for his tour, to say the least, with the violent protests breaking out in Melbourne upon his arrival.

He is a lewd, walking contradiction, for example he is gay, yet doesn't really stick up for the LGBT community and appeals to many conservatives for his strong right winged views.

Yiannopoulos is against political correctness and has helped support white supremacist views when he worked as a journalist.  He has stirred the pot with feminists down under by plastering a picture of Clementine Ford and labelling her 'unfuckable'. He is against feminism and labels it cancer.

He has labelled muslims as 'rapists' and 'terrorists', has expressed a view that underage sex can be consensual and refers to victims of child sexual abuse as 'attention seekers'.

Milo Yiannopoulos is either genuinely confused about who he is or he knows exactly what he's doing, which is causing a stir to the general population and the more attention we pay to it, the more attention he gets.

Yiannopoulos started his life as an attention seeking stirrer. He has dropped out of university twice. He had a life of privilege but never managed to do anything meaningful. He may talk with a posh accent but all you have to do is scratch the surface and you will find that he's just full of thoughtless easy labels and ignorance. His audience finding him easy to understand and identify with.

He certainly has a lot to say, but a shallow brook will always babble the loudest.

'Shut him up!' is the common rhetoric from protesters, 'Don't let him speak in parliament'! There are petitions going around social media to prevent him from talking in Australia.

The truth is that we can try to prevent him from talking as much as we want but just like Pauline Hanson's views may not be popular with most, there is still an appetite for right winged views. We cannot be the thought police of other individuals. Yiannopoulos wouldn't have an audience if other people didn't agree with what he says.

He is not an influencer of the Australian people he is merely voicing the views of what was already there.

Milo Yiannopoulos is not a member of the australian parliament.

He is not a real game changer, he is a uneducated, attention seeking, sunglass-wearing fly, that will buzz away back to the UK once his tour has finished.

His words do not shock me and he shouldn't shock you either.

In the mean time, can we please keep Paul McCartney?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How safe is your baby really?

The strict requirements sound fit for hannibal lecter or a vampire. But no, it's actually for babies.  Safety requirements change over time but maternal instinct and proper supervision don't.  When I was expecting my first child I was super excited about the prospect of buying new stuff. In that 'decorate the nursery' kind of way. When I walked into the baby store that excitement quickly turned into dread. so many products were shouting at me. 'BUY ME.' 'You'll need me to make your child SMART. You'll need me to keep your child SAFE. There was so many products aimed at babies, newborns, 6 months, 12 months. I tried to rationalise it all. What did I really need? I then categorised them into 'nice to haves' and 'essentials'. 'I shouldn't buy this book (number 30)' I thought to myself.  How much can a 6 week old baby really read or understand? As the Mum guilt ensues.. the credit card comes out. Take my mone...

Malcolm in the Middle

Why it’s better to be feared than loved if you cannot be both After the recent resignation of Malcolm Turnbull there has been much commentary surrounding his contributions or, more accurately, lack of contributions during his stint as Prime Minister. Leading up to his original appointment as Prime Minister he came with much promise and ambition as a strong Coalition leader. He represented a palatable ‘centre-right’ leader with moderate political beliefs. On the one hand approved by conservatives for being pro business and those to the left found him to be their preferred coalition leader for his stance on the Republic.  His political persona was a smooth negotiator and a successful wealthy business man in his own right.  Finding the balance between being a leader with conviction and one who played it safe and survived was the question for Turnbull. He chose the latter. Self preservation. Unfortunately in politics, it is cut throat, even choosing the saf...

It's not accurate to say that someone 'lost' their battle with cancer

Whenever I see a well known person or celebrity who died of cancer the common text surrounding the death will usually include sentences such as ‘they lost their battle with cancer.’ I’ve had family members pass away from this disease but I know that I am not alone. Around 1 in 3 people will be diagnosed with cancer at some point in their lives. My issue with the phrase is that cancer is not a battle one can control. By categorising a cancer death with ‘losing the battle’ implies that there is an element of control by the person suffering from the disease. The success rate will depend on the stage of cancer, how far it has spread and how aggressive the cancer is. Even after a cancer battle is ‘won’ (meaning remission) it is still an on going burden. Cancer treatment today involves chemotherapy but the important thing to remember is that chemotherapy is not a cure. It is a treatment. That individual will still need to monitor their cancer for years to come. ...