Skip to main content

Posts

‘Let them eat cake’ - How NSW Youth fell through the cracks under Berejiklian

Youth are being sold the carrot of NSW’s strong economy, even though they fail to benefit from it.  At yesterday’s campaign launch Berejiklian announced that NSW can ‘have it all’. Speaking to the crowd, she boasted about the lowest unemployment rates in NSW..ever. Berejiklian has pledged to spend billions on schools, hospitals and infrastructure.  The carrot for voters?  NSW’s strong economy.  NSW’s strong economy is conducive the astronomical property boom that Sydney experienced. Sydney’s median house prices experienced an 86 per cent increase in the last 5 years. Stamp duty from property has contributed to the budget surplus.  That surplus has been spent on infrastructure under Berejiklian and her predecessors, including the light rail project, West Connex and the demolishing of the ANZ stadium.  If you think that NSW will have never ending surpluses to spend in the coming years, you may be mistaken.   The spending spree will have to come to a halt. As there are some
Recent posts

The royal banking commission findings shouldn't shock you.

Consumers  are given the  illusion  of  choice  but rarely have much  choice . And the devil is always in the detail. The recent Royal Banking Commission revealed unethical conduct through our most trusted financial institutions. Some of the conduct included;  charging fees to deceased customers ,  irresponsible lending ,  insurance products that failed to deliver or were considered to be unsuitable products for  consumers  to name a few. Without going into the specifics, no one objects that customers were treated poorly and deserve retribution. But in a system where winners take it all and more money equates to a higher success level whether that's through bonus, higher status, rewards, a raise, the question isn't 'Why did this happen'? It should really be; Why should we expect bankers or financial advisers to act any differently? The whole concept of capitalism was built on the exploitation of some for the benefit of others. It has never been an e

Royals may be Britain's only hope

With Brexit plans on hold..Brits may have to cling to the monarch.  PM Theresa May was left holding the lower hand when she inherited the sticky Brexit problem. It was an ambitious and bold move by a member of parliament to seek leadership in a not-so-ideal political climate. But many leaders who have inherited less-than-ideal political situations have pushed through and been admired later on (even if it takes years to whittle out the bad policy memories). An example of this is George H.W Bush who inherited a deficit of $220 billion in 1983, he rose taxes and high income earners were hit the most, was it popular at the time? No. But did it reduce America's deficit in the long run? Yes. When John Howard implemented the GST, it was not popular but reduced debt, his decision to ban guns in Tasmania was not popular but appreciated in the long run. Even Julia Gillard's carbon tax is not viewed in a harsh light now that time has passed and there has been no other apparently success

The trend for natural is overrated.

Mothers who originally choose to get a c section are often convinced to do it the natural way, as in counselled out of it. Grown women are not even trusted to make decisions with their own bodies (sound familiar? see -abortion laws). I'm in that 30 something stage of life where the majority of my peers are married, popping out kids while some are travelling the world or working in amazing careers. My instagram account is flooded with everything natural, natural foods, natural childbirth (though not in graphic detail-thankfully), natural breast feeding. Natural medicine. Natural mineral make up. I had recently congratulated a friend of mine as his wife had just had a baby three days before. He was super stoked and of course very proud of his wife and newborn. 'I'm so proud, she gave birth naturally with a 24 hour labour, without any drugs at all' he quipped. 'They offered to induce her and give her an epidural but she refused'. Another friend had a simi

How safe is your baby really?

The strict requirements sound fit for hannibal lecter or a vampire. But no, it's actually for babies.  Safety requirements change over time but maternal instinct and proper supervision don't.  When I was expecting my first child I was super excited about the prospect of buying new stuff. In that 'decorate the nursery' kind of way. When I walked into the baby store that excitement quickly turned into dread. so many products were shouting at me. 'BUY ME.' 'You'll need me to make your child SMART. You'll need me to keep your child SAFE. There was so many products aimed at babies, newborns, 6 months, 12 months. I tried to rationalise it all. What did I really need? I then categorised them into 'nice to haves' and 'essentials'. 'I shouldn't buy this book (number 30)' I thought to myself.  How much can a 6 week old baby really read or understand? As the Mum guilt ensues.. the credit card comes out. Take my mone

Malcolm in the Middle

Why it’s better to be feared than loved if you cannot be both After the recent resignation of Malcolm Turnbull there has been much commentary surrounding his contributions or, more accurately, lack of contributions during his stint as Prime Minister. Leading up to his original appointment as Prime Minister he came with much promise and ambition as a strong Coalition leader. He represented a palatable ‘centre-right’ leader with moderate political beliefs. On the one hand approved by conservatives for being pro business and those to the left found him to be their preferred coalition leader for his stance on the Republic.  His political persona was a smooth negotiator and a successful wealthy business man in his own right.  Finding the balance between being a leader with conviction and one who played it safe and survived was the question for Turnbull. He chose the latter. Self preservation. Unfortunately in politics, it is cut throat, even choosing the safe path of

Private schools and the rise of inequality

With the rise of  inequality , some parents  feel pressured  to fork out $120k to keep up with ‘the Joneses’ by sending their kids to private schools. So is it worth it? As soon as a baby comes into the world new parents start thinking about their children's future.  Not what pre-school, day care or primary school they should attend but, in particular, which high school they should attend? and whether or not they should be sending their child to a private school. For a lot of parents this isn't even a question. As for those on average salaries, private schools charging up 20-30k per year is simply not an option. Even less of an option when you add more than one child to the mix.  You may be wondering why parents should worry about which high school their newborn baby should attend as it's at least 12/13 years away but alas, the race into private school has already begun. If parents want to 'keep up with the Joneses' they need to get cracking on thos