Skip to main content

Malcolm in the Middle



Why it’s better to be feared than loved if you cannot be both

After the recent resignation of Malcolm Turnbull there has been much commentary surrounding his contributions or, more accurately, lack of contributions during his stint as Prime Minister.

Leading up to his original appointment as Prime Minister he came with much promise and ambition as a strong Coalition leader. He represented a palatable ‘centre-right’ leader with moderate political beliefs. On the one hand approved by conservatives for being pro business and those to the left found him to be their preferred coalition leader for his stance on the Republic. 

His political persona was a smooth negotiator and a successful wealthy business man in his own right. 

Finding the balance between being a leader with conviction and one who played it safe and survived was the question for Turnbull. He chose the latter. Self preservation.

Unfortunately in politics, it is cut throat, even choosing the safe path of self preservation is no guarantee. Especially in recent years, where prime minister leaders have failed to sustain a full term without someone challenging their leadership after a few bad polls.  Like a nervous trader on the stock exchange, politicians haven’t learnt to weather the storm and not jump ship on the first sign of trouble, that is, changing leaders when it is not necessary, or even potentially, to their party’s detriment.

Turnbull had to appease those in his party. He did this by playing it safe, but he also made a few fundamental errors. He could have taken a tip from Machiavelli;

It is better to be feared than loved if you cannot be both.

Turnbull tried to be loved by both sides. This lead to his demise as Prime Minister. 

The second fundamental error he made was to allow Tony Abbott to hang around in the background, causing ruckus by criticising the NEG. Once a politician has been axed as Prime Minister, it is better for the new leader, if they resign. Tony Abbott wasn’t going anywhere anytime soon. You cannot have the full support of your party if an old leader is still lurking in the background. Even if you scrape just enough support to take over the reins.  

It was the same situation with Kevin Rudd still hanging around after being axed for Julia Gillard. It is a weak spot. If it’s not taken care of, the foundation will start to crumble. 

In Turnbull’s case it started to fester, and those on the far right such as Dutton started to protest louder.

The world is changing and becoming more bipartisan in politics, an example of this is Brexit and Donald Trump being elected. The divide between the right and left is getting even bigger, fuelled by social media and the era of fake news. It would, however, suggest that Australia too, may not have the appetite for a moderate political party leader. The desire may be for a leader with more conviction and one that has a clearer stance on the big issues. 

It would seem that there is no room for moderate anymore. 

Malcolm was always going to be stuck in the middle.  


















Comments

Popular posts from this blog

‘Let them eat cake’ - How NSW Youth fell through the cracks under Berejiklian

Youth are being sold the carrot of NSW’s strong economy, even though they fail to benefit from it.  At yesterday’s campaign launch Berejiklian announced that NSW can ‘have it all’. Speaking to the crowd, she boasted about the lowest unemployment rates in NSW..ever. Berejiklian has pledged to spend billions on schools, hospitals and infrastructure.  The carrot for voters?  NSW’s strong economy.  NSW’s strong economy is conducive the astronomical property boom that Sydney experienced. Sydney’s median house prices experienced an 86 per cent increase in the last 5 years. Stamp duty from property has contributed to the budget surplus.  That surplus has been spent on infrastructure under Berejiklian and her predecessors, including the light rail project, West Connex and the demolishing of the ANZ stadium.  If you think that NSW will have never ending surpluses to spend in the coming years, you may be mistaken.   The spending spree wi...

To all the mothers, I am sorry

This year has really been a whirlwind. I welcomed my first child into the world on 20 March. To say that it's been a huge change is an understatement. But I have an apology to make. That apology is to all the mothers out there who I did not understand...at least before I had my daughter. I'm sorry that I failed to understand why you could not be on time. I used to think that it was as simple as shoving your child into the carseat and starting the ignition. I mean what is so hard about that? You just grab the kid and go right?.... I did not understand that infants need to be fed on demand. That they can have a poo explosion at any time. A crying fit for no reason. All these things can contribute to punctuality. Not to mention the sheer amount of things you need to pack for simple outings that may last an hour or two. Have I got the formula? the bibs? the bottles? the plastic bags to put dirty nappies? the spare change of clothes (or two)? the change mat? not to mention m...

Private schools and the rise of inequality

With the rise of  inequality , some parents  feel pressured  to fork out $120k to keep up with ‘the Joneses’ by sending their kids to private schools. So is it worth it? As soon as a baby comes into the world new parents start thinking about their children's future.  Not what pre-school, day care or primary school they should attend but, in particular, which high school they should attend? and whether or not they should be sending their child to a private school. For a lot of parents this isn't even a question. As for those on average salaries, private schools charging up 20-30k per year is simply not an option. Even less of an option when you add more than one child to the mix.  You may be wondering why parents should worry about which high school their newborn baby should attend as it's at least 12/13 years away but alas, the race into private school has already begun. If parents want to 'keep up with the Joneses' they need to get cracking on ...